ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC34 N1**

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC34/WG2 N35

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC34/WG2

Information Technology --
Document Description and Processing Languages
-- Information Presentation

TITLE: Amendment 1 to ISO/IEC 9541-1: Typeface design grouping
SOURCE: Project Editor
PROJECT: JTC1.34.27.01.01
PROJECT EDITOR: Y. Komachi
STATUS: This document is prepared as the final text for publication, according to the approved Recommendation 3 (SC34 N0122) of November 1999 Meeting of ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG2 in Philadelphia:
3. AM1 to ISO/IEC 9541-1: Typeface design grouping
WG2 accepts WG2 N25 as revised disposition of comments on DAM1, and instructs the editor to create the final text of AM1/9541-1 and forward it to the SC34 Secretariat for processing of publication.
ACTION:
DATE: 2000-06-08
DISTRIBUTION: SC34 and Liaisons
REFER TO: SC34 N0120 (WG2 N25): Disposition of comments on DAM1
REPLY TO: Dr. James David Mason
(ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34 Chairman)
SAIC
Information Technology Services
Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant
Bldg. 9113, M.S. 8208
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8208 U.S.A.
Telephone: +1 423 574-6973
Facsimile: +1 423 574-18964
Network: masonjd@ornl.gov

http://www.ornl.gov/sgml/sc34/
ftp://ftp.ornl.gov/pub/sgml/sc34/
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34
American National Standards Institute
11 West 42nd Street
New York, NY 10036
Tel: +1 212 642 4976
Fax: +1 212 840 2298
Email: mpeacock@ansi.org


Information technology - Font information interchange -
Part 1: Architecture
Amendment 1: Typeface design grouping



Annex

Replace the Annex A of ISO/IEC 9541-1:1991 with the following Annex:



Annex A
(normative)
Typeface design grouping


This annex defines a typeface design grouping scheme whose purpose is to provide values for the mandatory DSNGROUP property defined in clause 8.6.15. This grouping scheme consists of a three-level hierarchical structure. The highest (most general) level of the hierarchy is the ISO Class, the second level of the hierarchy is the ISO Subclass, and the third (most specific) level of the hierarchy is the ISO Specific Group. Typeface examples for each Specific Group are shown and named wherever possible. These illustrations are intended to serve only as informative examples, not as a comprehensive catalog.

Typefaces which are similar in appearance or which have characteristics that would allow them to be reasonably substituted for each other, are grouped together.

Some type designs could be associated with more than one design group, but it is the responsibility of the type designer or font resource generator to choose the most appropriate group.

This typeface grouping scheme has the following intended purposes:

When using this grouping scheme, it may be necessary to consider properties additional to those described in clause 8 when selecting substitution fonts. Since the grouping value specifies only the style and appearance of a font, additional properties such as NOMCAPSTEMWIDTH, LCHEIGHT, and metrics can prove useful in matching the layout and typographic color of a page, and in achieving the best overall match.

NOTE 42 Throughout this grouping scheme, the term "serif" is used to denote both the traditional concept of the serifs of Roman typefaces, as well as any style of non-plain stroke-ending used in a non-Latin typeface. Although non-Latin typefaces with non-plain stem endings are included in groups with "serif" in their names, it may generally be improper to refer to them as "serif" typefaces. The term "sans serif" is used to denote a plain, unembellished stroke ending.

1.0.0 Uncials class

Typefaces in this class use as a source of their design the Uncial writing hands of Europe used from the 4th to the 10th Century.

1.1.0 Uncials::Single alphabet subclass

These designs are characterized by having one set of alphabetic glyphs having a mixture of both upper and lowercase letter shapes consistent with the historical Uncial book hand.

1.1.1 Uncials::Single alphabet::Sans Serif

Typefaces in this group have the characteristics of Uncial glyph images, but have plain stem endings.


Figure A.1 - Amsterdam SIMPLEX

1.1.2 Uncials::Single alphabet::Serif

Typefaces in this group have the characteristics of Uncial, and have the serifs that were typical of the historical forms.


Figure A.2 - Amsterdam LIBRA

1.2.0 Uncials::Duplex alphabet subclass

The designs of this subclass are characterized primarily by having distinct and separate upper and lowercase letter shapes (a characteristic not found in historical examples).

1.2.1 Uncials::Duplex alphabet::Sans Serif

Typefaces in this group have duplex Uncial forms with plain stem endings.

No Sample Available
Figure A.3 - (---)

1.2.2 Uncials::Duplex alphabet::Serif

Typefaces in this group have duplex Uncial forms with serifs for stem endings.


Figure A.4 - Klingspor AMERICAN UNCIAL

2.0.0 Inscriptionals class

Latin typefaces of this general class have the characteristics of being based on monumental lettering which was cut in stone. Generally they include only uppercase letters and are based on the proportions of the classic Roman inscriptional glyph images, e.g., having a narrow "E", "F", and "L".

2.1.0 Inscriptionals::Solids subclass

These designs have solid stems.

2.1.1 Inscriptionals::Solids::Sans Serif

Typefaces in this group are based on inscriptional styles, have solid stems, and plain stem endings.


Figure A.5 - Adobe LITHOS

2.1.2 Inscriptionals::Solids::Serif

Typefaces in this group are based on inscriptional styles, have solid stems, and non-plain stem endings.


Figure A.6 - Stempel SISTINA

2.2.0 Inscriptionals::Inlines subclass

These designs have a fine line in the stem which gives the appearance that the lettering is incised in stone or wood.

2.2.1 Inscriptionals::Inlines::Sans Serif

Inscriptional style typefaces with inlines and plain stem endings.

No Sample Available
Figure A.7 - (---)

2.2.2 Inscriptionals::Inlines::Serif

Inscriptional style typefaces with inlines and nonplain stem endings.


Figure A.8 - Nebiolo AUGUSTEA INLINE

2.3.0 Inscriptionals::Outlines subclass

The designs of this subclass are characterized by single lines that define the contour or outline of the glyphs.

2.3.1 Inscriptionals::Outlines::Sans Serif

This group consists of outlined inscriptional styles with plain stem endings.

No Sample Available
Figure A.9 - (---)

2.3.2 Inscriptionals::Outlines::Serif

This group consists of outlined inscriptional styles with non-plain stem endings.


Figure A.10 - Bauer COLUMNA


Figure A.11 - Morisawa LINEA

3.0.0 Blackletters class

Designs in this class are characterized by relatively bold, angular, and condensed character shapes. Latin typefaces in this class are generally based on the late medieval European book hands known as the Blackletter style. Some variations include bold rounded styles as well as less formal designs showing cursive influences. Non-Latin typefaces in this class are those based on bold and angular designs.

3.1.0 Blackletters::Formal style subclass

The designs of this subclass are characterized by their condensed appearance; large x-height; with little or no curves, giving an angular look to the lowercase. Latin-alphabet versions of these typefaces were, historically, reserved for Bible printing, and were based on the ecclesiastical writing style.

3.1.1 Blackletters::Formal style::Sans serif

This group consists of formal Blackletter designs with plain stem endings.


Figure A.12 - ITC HONDA

3.1.2 Blackletters::Formal style::Serif

This group consists of formal Blackletter designs with serifs for stem endings.


Figure A.13 - Lanston Monotype GOUDY TEXT


Figure A.14 - Ryobi MIYABI


Figure A.15 - Cimos, KUFI Script

3.1.3 Blackletters::Formal style::Sans serif, engraved

..........
..........
..........

7.9.3 Ornamentals::Miscellaneous::Script

The designs of this group have handwritten appearance with some decoration.


Figure A.199 - Sha-ken EKZ INAKUZURE

8.0.0 Symbols and Ornamentals class

(reserved for future assignment)